Why would two different doctors give two different causes of a disease or outcome
The hazards of the undedescended testis: 1. sterlity 2. Pain. liable to repeated injury. 3.hernia is possible 4. Torsion of the spermatic cord. 5. Sometimes there will be Epidydymo -orchitis 6. it may atrophy. 7. increased liability to malignancy, would this risk be greater if surgery was done incorrectly? Stones are not due to the undescended testis but due to excess of milk since the milk contains calcium and the stones might be due to calcium oxalate crystals, they were not. How could you prove what it was caused from, when it is very unusual in the first place. It would be interesting to know if it was a doctor answering the question and where they practice medicine at? An expert pediatric urologist said that the stones were caused from the negligent surgery to fix the undescended testes at age two that did not fix the testes and was then left untreated for several years, and not the milk, how could you say that this is not true? what evidence do you have to support your answer?
Answers:ask this question to a third doctor
A diagnosis is only a science of educated guesses matching symptoms of the patient to symptoms of known disease states. This is the reason you are encouraged to get second and third opinions.
- why would swallowing mercury k..
- Why would someone sweat so muc..
- Why would Sam think I failed t..
- why would one pupil be larger ..
- why would antidepressants help..
- Why would a woman have a HYSTE..
- Why would a Dr who had a patie..
- why wont they make opiate medi..
- Why when ladies go to the OB-G..
- why we take medicines